Re: ? Comyn partner off Malise
Concerning Comyn child who was simply spouse off Malise regarding Strathearn, I’d theorized in the 2005 you to definitely she was basically Margaret, recognized as spouse regarding Sir John de Keith (find backup out of article below) who was simply 2ndly elizabeth are provided where article: the new spouse Emma I recommend are of another friends, and never mommy of second Earl Malise.
Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl away from Buchan_ , says simply, ‘Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn, got a spouse Emma, into the 1261-1267, whoever surname is actually unknown ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. from Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. a little while just before 1270, making sure that his widow (Margaret) could have been «available» a little while after Emma.
It was definitely a speculation; it does have the benefit of coping with a well-known relationships anywhere between Muriel Keith and you may Reginald le Cheyne. Any longer relevant papers manage however become enjoy.
Brand new account in Scots Peerage regarding the class of Keith says out-of Sir John de- Keith (d. california. 1270) which he is believed to possess hitched Comyn, earl out-of Buchan . So it personality, of unsure («believed to were») diversity, can now feel corrected according to the pursuing the dispensation, dated in the Fondi into 14 Jan 1378/9::
‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 Into the bishop off Moray. Faculty in order to dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you will Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, regarding Moray and you may Aberdeen dioceses, on obstacle to help you relationships due to the next and 4th levels of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘
Muriel Keith, the near future 2nd wife off Robert Stewart, very first Duke away from Albany (d. 1420), was developed to help you wed Reginald le Cheyne, child from Sir Reginald ce Cheyne because of the their partner (given that their particular very first husband), Helen of Strathearn. When you find yourself you can find notable openings from the ancestry out-of Muriel Keith, she and you may Reginald ce Cheyne create share a lineage regarding the Comyns. However, this will be also distant to require good dispensation in the event the Muriel is actually an effective-great-high grandd Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1233), which will function as the situation in the event that is the reason child.
2. Reginald le Cheyne was good-grandson out of Marjory Comyn, daughter away from Alexander Comyn, Earl away from Buchan (d. 1290), young man regarding William Comyn in the list above. Her child is Malise, Earl off Strathearn of 1312 so you can his passing in the 1328 , and you may pops regarding Reginald.
ca. 1270), is actually identical to Marjory Comyn, and you will hitched 2ndly so you’re able to Malise, Earl out of Strathearn (d. 1312). This will mean the latest parentage a€?said to enjoys been’ regarding Margaret, partner regarding Sir John de Keith, are from one generation: she’d not have become the d Comyn, Earl out of Buchan, but instead out-of his young man Alexander. There’s absolutely no evidence that Earl Malise and you will Marjory Comyn was basically married far before 1275: as Lindsay typed,
You will find that discernable basis on which the relationship ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and Muriel Keith will have existed: if Margaret Comyn, spouse regarding Sir John de- Keith (d
‘ This new wife of this earl, on 1275, was called Marjory, as we understand the attesting clause from No. curriculum vitae., that is said by the Wyntoun, Publication VIII. man. vi., to possess been the following sis out-of John Comyn, Earl of Buchan, who negotiated on the behalf of Earl Malise the marriage settlement more than stated [dated at London, April twenty-six, 1293 to own their child Matilda and Robert de- Tony, young buck out-of Ralph].’
Alexander Comyn = Elizabeth de Quincy E away from Buchan We __________________I________________ We III step 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith I (als I Elizabeth from Strathearn . 1270 We Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ We We I I We We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de- Keith Elizabeth regarding = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony I ______I_______________________ I We I We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de E off Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 We le Cheyne I We We = 2) Sir David I V I We de Graham Sir William de I I__________ Keith We We = Margaret https://kissbrides.com/bravodate-review/ Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I We III I I We I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke away from Albany)
