I plus desired to observe chance-providing proportions were linked to works properties and so questioned the fresh players in our data to point from what extent the things they’re doing might possibly be distinguisheded given that varied, risky and you can/otherwise intense. The root hypothesis are one an over-all desire to take chances might be reflected within the variety of functions (Pick Zuckerman 2007 ).
Aims and secret parameters
Our very own main aim contained in this investigation were to finest see man’s general thinking visit this website here into exposure-taking, the way they are influenced by socio-group records and you may identification and exactly how they are shown much more specific exposure-bringing thinking and you will behavior.
Penned online:
Q1. How could be the solutions marketed on every of the chance size? Our theory here try one (H1) people are generally chance averse and the shipment regarding solutions would be skewed to your risk averse part of the size.
Q2. What is the family amongst the risk proportions and you may market variables? Centered on earlier lookup i asked that (H2) guys is a whole lot more willing to take risks than simply female and you can younger alot more happy than simply older people. We’d no certain hypotheses concerning the almost every other socio-group variables.
Q3. What’s the loved ones within chance-delivering proportions and you can identity? Centered on intuitions as well as earlier browse we questioned because the the hypothesis (H3) you to definitely chance-getting thinking is undoubtedly synchronised that have a good) Sensation Seeking to and its subscales, with b) Extraversion and you can Psychoticism of one’s EPQ measure and you will c) with Extraversion and Visibility in order to this new event on the Huge Five scale.
Q4. What is the family relations involving the exposure proportions and you may performs features? I requested right here you to definitely (H4) risk-getting perceptions was undoubtedly coordinated having choice of works you to is varied, risky and you may/or actual.
Q5. What is the family involving the risk size and you can willingness so you can participate in harmful situations? We asked that (H5) risk-bringing thinking could be surely regarding desire become energetic inside the risky athletics, high-risk perform and you can high-risk military operations.
Q6. What are the primary predictors out of chance-getting? We requested right here (H6) the hypothesized character traits along with sex and ages is the most crucial predictors.
Topic and techniques
Investigation was indeed collected because of the Ipsos Browse Institute, an international providers which have ISO9001 and ISO 202252 permits. Studies was basically built-up during fourteen days inside . This new respondents was indeed employed regarding organizations very own databases, that contains all the entered phone numbers inside Norway, as well as cell phones. Wide variety were picked on a lottery foundation additionally the interviewers requested to the person in the family, out of 15 years or above, whose birthday is actually 2nd. To-arrive step 1,100 over interviews twenty-two,355 citizens were contacted which have all in all, 61,916 phone calls. Ones contacted nine,567 replied and 12,788 failed to. A total of step one,100 participants up coming complete the device interview, hence survived approximately to get minutes. The impulse speed out of those people called try four percent and you may regarding those who answered 10 percent. Although the impulse costs should optimally was higher, a better review unearthed that the newest try came across standards getting representativity on chosen details. The final try scored really. Age is actually amassed in years. For ages fifteen–twenty four decades the sample hit 82% of your own inhabitants purpose, 25–39 decades 109%, 40–44 many years 90%, 50–59 years 112%, 60–69 age 110%, as well as 70 + age 94%. Whilst the take to scored really into age and other record parameters, we might underline which our use of the phrase ‘new population’ or ‘the fresh new Norwegian population’ on the article have to be drawn with some alerting considering the representativity matter.
