Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: «Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body»; «What do you wish you looked like?»; «What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?»; «What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?» Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 («actual»); Rtt= 0.77 («ideal»); Rtt= 0.71 («attractive»); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 («actual» and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger Estonia esposa caliente et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Dietary discipline are measured by Losing weight Size of one’s Eating Attitudes Decide to try (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), comprised of 16 comments scored towards good 6-area size (never ever = 0/constantly = 5), which have higher scores indicating a higher level off restrained eating. Into the Eat psychometrical services look for Garner ainsi que al. (1982). Brand new structure coefficient for trials, the new Mexican and German of those, try of the same well worth, an alpha regarding 0.76.
Weight reduction discipline
Ineffectiveness scale. The newest bad apply to foundation is estimated through the Ineffectiveness Level regarding the brand new Food Problems Collection (EDI) (Gather mais aussi al., 1983), that has shown a convergent authenticity (ineffectiveness/self-esteem ) regarding R = 0.70 (p
Medical personnel grabbed the weight and you will top procedures
Body mass index (BMI). Bmi is actually calculated since pounds within the kilograms divided because of the top when you look at the rectangular meters (Body mass index = kg/m2).
Before data collection, a pilot study of brand new Silhouettes Size (Contour step 1), applied to a sample composed of 20 North american country youngsters, was utilized to check this new appropriateness of rates so you’re able to depict human anatomy versions, so you’re able to corroborate good acceptation out of an as yet not known selection of silhouettes and you may a very clear comprehension of the fresh new instructions (this new Italian language group already mentioned which have study in this admiration). The results exhibited this new Outline Size was a or a keen appropriate tool into North american country take to.
This new detectives of the two regions, at Mexico City and also at Hae (standardized) process. The newest questionnaires were put on categories of scientific and you may breastfeeding youngsters during the Mexican and Italian language colleges. One reason why behind the latest ples out of pupils regarding drug is just the appeal one (it’s possible to suppose) these teenagers need to have into scientific occupation and also for health conditions, causing them to a lot more responsive to dilemmas such ED. Advised consent was obtained from all of the research participants. All the called students agreed to participate. This new respective local integrity committees approved this new low-intrusive process. Elite translators undertook and you can regulated the translation and you may retranslation of one’s tool.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for
