Ross, Cody T., Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Seung-Yun Oh, Samuel Bowles, Bret Beheim, John Bunce, . “Modification so you’re able to: ‘Greater money inequality, smaller polygyny: rethinking the newest polygyny threshold model’.” Diary of the Royal People interface 15 (147): 20180752.
Sellen attraktivste puertoricanisch Frauen, Daniel W., and you will Daniel J. Hruschka. 2004. “Extracted-dinner funding-defense polygyny in the native western north american Communities during the contact.” Most recent anthropology 45 (5): 707–fourteen. Silas, Ellis. 1926. A primitive Arcadia. London: T. Fisher Unwin Ltd. Spencer, Herbert. 1876. Values of Sociology: Vol. step one. London: Appleton.
Starkweather, Katherine Age., and you may Raymond Hames. 2012. “A study regarding Low-Classical Polyandry.” Human nature 23 (2): 149–72. Textor, Robert B. 1967. A cross-Social Realization. The Retreat, CT: HRAF Force.
Light, Douglas Roentgen., and Michael L. Burton. 1988. “Causes of Polygyny: Ecology, Savings, Kinship, and you will Warfare.” American anthropologist 90 (4): 871–87.
Whiting, John W. Meters. 1964. “Ramifications of climate into the particular cultural techniques.” Into the Explorations from inside the Cultural Anthropology: Essays honoring George Peter Murdock, modified by Ward Seem Goodenough, 511–forty-two. Nyc, NY: McGraw-Slope.
Whiting, John W. Yards., and you can Beatrice B. Whiting. 1975. “Aloofness and Intimacy out of Husbands and you will Spouses: A cross-Social Study.” Ethos 3 (2): 183–207.
- The newest data are from the newest Ethnographic Atlas Murdock (1962–1971) due to the fact retrieved off when you look at the D-Place.org (Kirby mais aussi al. 2016) ??
- This type of numbers are derived from research throughout the Standard Cross Social Take to that have been coded by the Broude and you will Greene (1985) ; these types of investigation on the relationships was indeed recovered away from D-Put changeable SCCS739. Of the 148 communities regarding the Standard Cross Cultural Shot and that Broude and you can Eco-friendly coded 31.1% provides full personal selection, 17.6% has personal possibilities that really needs adult acceptance, 3.4% has private choice which also wanted parental plan, 18.2% enjoys sometimes individual options or install matrimony, 16.9% enjoys created matrimony, however, folks have the capability to object, and you can 12.8% have fully create relationship.??
- This new data within part and in this new Figure try situated on the study regarding Fundamental Get across-Cultural Test (Murdock and you can White 1969) ; this type of studies toward polygyny was basically recovered of D-Lay varying SCCS211. The quality Get across-Social Sample (SCCS) try a sample regarding 185 societies. Figures on the SCCS also told brand new provided cake chart below.??
- There are only 2 polyandrous communities regarding the SCCS.??
- Of the various form of polygyny, minimal is most frequent, accompanied by nonsororal polygyny, following sororal polygyny.??
- A corner-variety study of mammals and you may wild birds M. Ember and you can Ember (1979) unearthed that an excess of female as well as predicted polygynous rather than monogamous connection. Certain research has maybe not discover help for the sex proportion idea, however, methods away from polygyny had been other (Hooper 2006; Quinlan and you will Quinlan 2007) otherwise changeable is actually imputed (Minocher, Duda, and you can Jaeggi 2019) .??
On the Human Affairs City Records
People Relations Urban area Documents, Inc. ( HRAF ) was an international approved team in the area of cultural anthropology. Their purpose should be to prompt and you can helps the fresh new cross-cultural examination of person society, area and you will conclusion in the past and present.
EHRAF Database
- eHRAF Business Societies
- eHRAF Archaeology
Contact HRAF
- Tel: 203-764-9401
The usual solution to sample theories will be to evaluate communities having and you can without a traditional trait to find out if this new adaptation is actually forecast by the type in an assumed causal factor. If you find yourself instance screening cannot be used without type to analyze, decisions various other creature species could possibly get highlight such theories. Naturally, we can not explore marriage various other kinds, however, we could see variety with some balances from inside the male-female mating and you can compare them with varieties without having people balances.
Various other societies, social recognition off marriage is founded on a successful demo several months. The brand new Guarani out-of South usa habit trial relationships, in which official matrimony techniques is actually deferred until pursuing the prospective bridegroom shows their viability getting wedding. Schaden and you may Lewinsohn (1962) tells us you to definitely
People exogamy/endogamy
Many anthropological account statement jealousy one of co-wives. ) discover that in approximately ninety% of the communities having co-wives, ethnographers statement sexual and you will emotional dispute plus they stop you to argument is more-or-shorter a great common in polygynous societies. Polygynous societies appear to have taken care of immediately jealousy having certain well-known culture and guidelines that include: that have independent home and you may kitchen areas to have nonsororal co-wives, having regulations regarding husbands discussing tips equitably, and having legislation having sleeping having co-spouses from inside the rotation (C. Roentgen. Ember, Ember, and you may Peregrine 2019, 245) . Provided big envy, some anthropologists see it puzzling one to polygyny is so commonplace (age.g., M. Ember (1974) ).
Have there been architectural things that will help you account for varying divorce costs? While some search aids the theory you to definitely societies with matrilocal quarters much more open-minded from separation (Minturn, Grosse, and you can Haider 1969) , almost every other research doesn’t discover the relationships such as for example good whenever almost every other situations try managed (Ackerman 1963; Pearson and you can Hendrix 1979) . Ackerman (1963) means that the levels to which a spouse are incorporated into an effective society’s origin build is more predictive. Such as for instance incorporation should be ahead of age neighborhood, or it will exist immediately following relationship, including being looked after by the a great ily. Ackerman (1963) finds you to definitely
Goody, Jack. 1973. “Bridewealth and you may Dowry inside the Africa and you can Eurasia.” During the Bridewealth and you may Dowry, modified by the Jack Goody and S. J. Tambiah, 1–58. Cambridge Records for the Societal Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press.
